This is the last post in the series evaluating Engageli as an active learning technology against the Educause rubric, as I address the last criteria: ‘Suitable for Active Learning Activities.’ (The ...
Next up in this series evaluating Engageli as an active learning technology against the Educause rubric is the criteria: ‘Flexible.’ (The introduction to the series can be found here.) In the ...
Next up in this series evaluating Engageli as an active learning technology against the Educause rubric is the criteria: ‘Equitable.’ (The introduction to the series can be found here.) In the ...
Next up in this series evaluating Engageli as an active learning technology against the Educause rubric is the criteria: ‘Broadly Available.’ (The introduction to the series can be found here.) In ...
Next up in this series evaluating Engageli according to a rubric published in Educause for measuring the effectiveness of active learning technologies is the criteria: ‘Participation.’ (The ...
Please join me as I look at how Engageli measures up against a rubric designed to evaluate active learning technologies. You can find an overview of this rubric and how Engageli stacks up here. In ...
Sasha Mathrani, a former teacher, instructional technologist, and current Engager, recently shared a post about active learning that highlighted two main points: 1) active learning matters, and 2) ...